Late adverse effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer

183Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Preoperative radiotherapy improves local control and survival in rectal cancer, but there are few reports on long-term morbidity. The aims of this study were to compare long-term morbidity and quality of life in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Methods: A total of 252 patients, randomized within the two Stockholm trials on preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer, were alive at a mean of 15 years after surgery. Some 139 of these patients were available for follow-up by questionnaires and clinical examination. Questionnaires regarding medical history and quality of life were completed by all patients. All patients had a clinical examination, and those without a stoma underwent rigid sigmoidoscopy. Results: Overall, patients who had preoperative radiotherapy experienced significantly more late complications than those who did not (69 versus 43 per cent; P = 0.002). This morbidity consisted mainly of cardiovascular disease (35 versus 19 per cent; P = 0.032), faecal incontinence (12 of 21 versus 11 of 42 patients having anterior resection; P = 0.013) and urinary incontinence (45 versus 27 per cent; P = 0.023). No significant differences between groups were found for hip or pelvic fractures, small bowel obstruction or global quality of life. Conclusion: Preoperative short-course, high-dose radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer increases the risk of anal and urinary dysfunction, and may lead to increased cardiovascular morbidity, at long-term follow-up. Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pollack, J., Holm, T., Cedermark, B., Altman, D., Holmström, B., Glimelius, B., & Mellgren, A. (2006). Late adverse effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 93(12), 1519–1525. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5525

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free