Great interactions: How binding incorrect partners can teach us about protein recognition and function

13Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Protein–protein interactions play a key part in most biological processes and understanding their mechanism is a fundamental problem leading to numerous practical applications. The prediction of protein binding sites in particular is of paramount importance since proteins now represent a major class of therapeutic targets. Amongst others methods, docking simulations between two proteins known to interact can be a useful tool for the prediction of likely binding patches on a protein surface. From the analysis of the protein interfaces generated by a massive cross-docking experiment using the 168 proteins of the Docking Benchmark 2.0, where all possible protein pairs, and not only experimental ones, have been docked together, we show that it is also possible to predict a protein's binding residues without having any prior knowledge regarding its potential interaction partners. Evaluating the performance of cross-docking predictions using the area under the specificity-sensitivity ROC curve (AUC) leads to an AUC value of 0.77 for the complete benchmark (compared to the 0.5 AUC value obtained for random predictions). Furthermore, a new clustering analysis performed on the binding patches that are scattered on the protein surface show that their distribution and growth will depend on the protein's functional group. Finally, in several cases, the binding-site predictions resulting from the cross-docking simulations will lead to the identification of an alternate interface, which corresponds to the interaction with a biomolecular partner that is not included in the original benchmark. Proteins 2016; 84:1408–1421. © 2016 The Authors Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes

4098Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2443Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network

2422Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Local Interaction Signal Analysis Predicts Protein-Protein Binding Affinity

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Protein—protein binding supersites

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Protein social behavior makes a stronger signal for partner identification than surface geometry

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vamparys, L., Laurent, B., Carbone, A., & Sacquin-Mora, S. (2016). Great interactions: How binding incorrect partners can teach us about protein recognition and function. Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics, 84(10), 1408–1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25086

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 11

48%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

33%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

33%

Computer Science 3

17%

Chemistry 3

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free