Acquired drug resistance during standardized treatment with first-line drugs in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: First-line drugs, if sensitive, are the most potent drugs in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). This study examined the frequency and risk factors associated with acquired drug resistance to first-line drugs during a standardized treatment using first-line drugs in patients with MDR-TB. Methods: This study included patients who were diagnosed with MDR-TB at the National Masan Tuberculosis Hospital between January 2004 and May 2008, treated with standardized first-line drugs, and for whom the pre and post-treatment results of the drug susceptibility test were available. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Of 41 MDR-TB patients, 14 (34.1%) acquired additional resistance to ethambutol (EMB) or pyrazinamide (PZA). Of 11 patients initially resistant to isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RFP), 3 (27.3%) acquired additional resistance to both EMB and PZA, and 3 (27.3%) to PZA. Of 18 patients initially resistant to INH, RFP and EMB, 6 (33.3%) acquired additional resistance to PZA. Of 6 patients initially resistant to INH, RFP and PZA, 2 (33.3%) acquired additional resistance to EMB. Ten of the 41 MDR-TB patients (24.4%) changed from resistant to susceptible. No statistically significant risk factors associated with acquired resistance could be found. Conclusion: First-line drugs should be used cautiously in the treatment of MDR-TB in Korea considering the potential acquisition of drug resistance. Copyright © 2009. The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jeon, D., Kim, D., Kang, H., Min, J., Sung, N., Hwang, S., & Park, S. (2009). Acquired drug resistance during standardized treatment with first-line drugs in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 66(3), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2009.66.3.198

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free