Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for about 15–20% of all breast cancers and differs from other invasive breast cancer types because it grows and spreads rapidly, it has limited treatment options and typically worse prognosis. Since TNBC does not express estrogen or progesterone receptors and little or no human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) proteins are present, hormone therapy and drugs targeting HER2 are not helpful, leaving chemotherapy only as the main systemic treatment option. In this context, it would be important to find molecular signatures able to stratify patients into high and low risk groups. This would allow oncologists to suggest the best therapeutic strategy in a personalized way, avoiding unnecessary toxicity and reducing the high costs of treatment. Here we compare two independent patient stratification strategies for TNBC based on gene expression data: The first is focusing on the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and the second on the tumor immune microenvironment. Our results show that the two stratification strategies are not directly related, suggesting that the aggressiveness of the tumor can be due to a multitude of unrelated factors. In particular, the EMT stratification is able to identify a high-risk population with high immune markers that is, however, not properly classified by the tumor immune microenvironment based strategy.
CITATION STYLE
Font-Clos, F., Zapperi, S., & La Porta, C. A. M. (2022). Classification of triple negative breast cancer by epithelial mesenchymal transition and the tumor immune microenvironment. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13428-2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.