On SA, CA, and GA numbers

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Gronwall's function G is defined for n>1 by, where σ(n) is the sum of the divisors of n. We call an integer N>1 a GA1 number if N is composite and G(N)≥G(N/p) for all prime factors p of N. We say that N is a GA2 number if G(N)≥G(aN) for all multiples aN of N. In (Caveney et al. Integers 11:A33, 2011), we used Robin's and Gronwall's theorems on G to prove that the Riemann Hypothesis (RH) is true if and only if 4 is the only number that is both GA1 and GA2. In the present paper, we study GA1 numbers and GA2 numbers separately. We compare them with superabundant (SA) and colossally abundant (CA) numbers (first studied by Ramanujan). We give algorithms for computing GA1 numbers; the smallest one with more than two prime factors is 183783600, while the smallest odd one is 1058462574572984015114271643676625. We find nineteen GA2 numbers ≤5040, and prove that a GA2 number N>5040 exists if and only if RH is false, in which case N is even and >108576. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Caveney, G., Nicolas, J. L., & Sondow, J. (2012). On SA, CA, and GA numbers. Ramanujan Journal, 29(1–3), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-012-9371-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free