Art Innovation or Plagiarism? Chinese Students' Attitudes Toward AI Painting Technology and Influencing Factors

3Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in art, particularly AI painting technology, has captivated significant attention and sparked debate. However, little is understood about the attitudes of Chinese students toward this technology and the factors influencing their perspectives. This study employed a mixed-methods approach to comprehensively appraise Chinese students' attitudes toward AI painting technology and the reasons behind these viewpoints. Data was collected from five universities and three high schools in China through questionnaire surveys and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative analysis demonstrated clear trends in students' attitudes toward AI painting technology, with gender, educational level, and background in art and design identified as significant influencing factors. Specifically, students with higher levels of education demonstrated more favorable attitudes toward AI painting technology. This was evidenced by a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.644 (p<0.01) between educational attainment and positive perceptions of this technology; whereas, a negative correlation with gender (coefficient of -0.263, p<0.01) indicated a difference in attitudes between male and female students, with males displaying more positive views. Specifically, background in art and design did not appear to significantly affect students' attitudes, as presented by an insignificant correlation coefficient of -0.048 (p>0.05). In addition, regression analysis, with an R2 value of 0.419, suggests that these variables can account for 41.9% of the variance in student attitudes toward AI painting, emphasizing the significant effect of gender and education level on their perspectives. Qualitative findings further indicated that concerns about copyright ethics, job displacement anxieties, personal values and aesthetic viewpoints, and broader social and environmental implications all affected students' attitudes toward AI painting technology. These findings offer valuable insights into the attitudes toward AI-generated technologies.

References Powered by Scopus

When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM

13869Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generative adversarial networks

9410Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models

7643Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI's impact on university students' task completion

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research on prompt engineering for large model art image generation

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gender differences in creative workers’ general attitudes toward artificial intelligence painting tools

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, C. (2024). Art Innovation or Plagiarism? Chinese Students’ Attitudes Toward AI Painting Technology and Influencing Factors. IEEE Access, 12, 85795–85805. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3412176

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 13

59%

Researcher 5

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 8

38%

Arts and Humanities 5

24%

Computer Science 5

24%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free