Lessons learned from methodological validation research in e-epidemiology

36Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Traditional epidemiological research methods exhibit limitations leading to high logistics, human, and financial burden. The continued development of innovative digital tools has the potential to overcome many of the existing methodological issues. Nonetheless, Web-based studies remain relatively uncommon, partly due to persistent concerns about validity and generalizability. Objective: The objective of this viewpoint is to summarize findings from methodological studies carried out in the NutriNet-Santé study, a French Web-based cohort study. Methods: On the basis of the previous findings from the NutriNet-Santé e-cohort (>150,000 participants are currently included), we synthesized e-epidemiological knowledge on sample representativeness, advantageous recruitment strategies, and data quality. Results: Overall, the reported findings support the usefulness of Web-based studies in overcoming common methodological deficiencies in epidemiological research, in particular with regard to data quality (eg, the concordance for body mass index [BMI] classification was 93%), reduced social desirability bias, and access to a wide range of participant profiles, including the hard-to-reach subgroups such as young (12.30% [15,118/122,912], <25 years) and old people (6.60% [8112/122,912], ≥65 years), unemployed or homemaker (12.60% [15,487/122,912]), and low educated (38.50% [47,312/122,912]) people. However, some selection bias remained (78.00% (95,871/122,912) of the participants were women, and 61.50% (75,590/122,912) had postsecondary education), which is an inherent aspect of cohort study inclusion; other specific types of bias may also have occurred. Conclusions: Given the rapidly growing access to the Internet across social strata, the recruitment of participants with diverse socioeconomic profiles and health risk exposures was highly feasible. Continued efforts concerning the identification of specific biases in e-cohorts and the collection of comprehensive and valid data are still needed. This summary of methodological findings from the NutriNet-Santé cohort may help researchers in the development of the next generation of high-quality Web-based epidemiological studies.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Participation Rates in Epidemiologic Studies

1499Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?

497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Web-based questionnaires: The future in epidemiology?

453Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Programme national nutrition santé - Guidelines score 2 (pnns-gs2): Development and validation of a diet quality score reflecting the 2017 French dietary guidelines

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Individual and combined effects of dietary factors on risk of incident hypertension prospective analysis from the nutrinet-santé cohort

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Environmental and nutritional analysis of the EAT-Lancet diet at the individual level: insights from the NutriNet-Santé study

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kesse-Guyot, E., Assmann, K., Andreeva, V., Castetbon, K., Méjean, C., Touvier, M., … Hercberg, S. (2016, July 1). Lessons learned from methodological validation research in e-epidemiology. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. JMIR Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.5880

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

53%

Researcher 6

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

63%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Social Sciences 2

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0