Midazolam for caudal analgesia in children: comparison with caudal bupivacaine

80Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a randomized, double-blind study we have examined the analgesic efficacy of caudal administration of midazolam, bupivacaine, or a mixture of both drugs in 45 children, undergoing inguinal herniotomy. They were allocated randomly into three groups (n = 15 in each) to receive a caudal injection of either 0.25% bupivacaine 1 ml · kg-1 with or without midazolam 50 μg · kg-1 or midazolam 50 μg · kg-1 with normal saline 1 ml · kg-1. There were no differences in quality of pain relief, postoperative behaviour or analgesic requirements between the midazolam group and the other two groups. Times to first analgesic administration (paracetamol suppositories) were longer (P < 0.001) in the bupivacaine-midazolam group than in the other two groups. Further, the bupivacaine-midazolam group received fewer (P < 0.05) doses of paracetamol than the bupivacaine group. Side effects such as motor weakness, respiratory depression or prolonged sedation were not observed in patients who received caudal epidural midazolam only. We conclude that caudal midazolam in a dose of 50 μg · kg-1 provides equivalent analgesia to bupivacaine 0.25%, when administered postoperatively in a volume of 1 ml · kg-1 for children following unilateral inguinal hemiotomy. © 1995 Canadian Anesthesiologists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naguib, M., El Gammal, M., Elhattab, Y. S., & Seraj, M. (1995). Midazolam for caudal analgesia in children: comparison with caudal bupivacaine. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 42(9), 758–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03011172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free