Comparison between fuzzy kernel c-means, fuzzy kernel possibilistic c-means and support vector machines in soft tissue tumor classification

5Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Soft Tissue Tumor (STT) are cell growths, whose existence are not limited to the presence of tumors in soft tissues. Furthermore, they are classified into soft tissue and non-soft tissue tumor and early detection is important to determine the right course of treatment. This research, therefore, aims to compare fuzzy kernel c-means, fuzzy kernel possibilistic c-means and support vector machines on Soft Tissue Tumor dataset, obtained from Nur Hidayah Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, consisting of 50 STT and 25 non-STT samples. The results conclude that fuzzy kernel c-means provides a better running time when using the parameter σ = 0.05. However, support vector machines, with the parameter σ = 0.0001 performs better than other methods in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and F1-Score.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rustam, Z., Hartini, S., Siswantining, T., Utami, D. A., & Putri, N. K. (2020). Comparison between fuzzy kernel c-means, fuzzy kernel possibilistic c-means and support vector machines in soft tissue tumor classification. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1103 AISC, pp. 92–105). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36664-3_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free