Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V

  • Cotta C
  • Alba E
  • Troya J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The performance of a genetic algorithm (GA) is dependent on many factors: the type of crossover operator, the rate of crossover, the rate of mutation, population size, and the encoding used are just a few examples. Currently, GA practitioners pick and choose GA parameters empirically until they achieve adequate performance for a given problem. In this paper we have isolated one such parameter: the crossover operator. The motivation for this study is to provide an adaptive crossover operator that gives best overall performance on a large set of problems. A new adaptive crossover operator “selective crossover” is proposed and is compared with two-point and uniform crossover on a problem generator where epistasis can be varied and on trap functions where deception can be varied. We provide empirical results which show that selective crossover is more efficient than two-point and uniform crossover across a representative set of search problems containing epistasis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cotta, C., Alba, E., & Troya, J. M. (1998). Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V. (A. E. Eiben, T. Bäck, M. Schoenauer, & H.-P. Schwefel, Eds.), PPSN (Vol. 1498, pp. 305–314). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056843

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free