Physician refer thyself: Is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?

26Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The United States spends more of its wealth on healthcare than any other developed country, land that share is rising. Supporters of the free market system point to the regulatory burden on the healthcare industry. Estimates of the regulatory costs of US healthcare range from $58 billion to $339 billion. A recent report indicates that approximately $8 billion of the US healthcare budget of $1.9 trillion is spent on physicians' extra income derived from their ownership in outpatient facilities, such as ambulatory surgery centers, diagnostic imaging centers, and diagnostic testing and procedure laboratories. It is essential for an interventionalist to understand fraud and abuse, self-referrals, and the implications of the Stark law and anti-kickback statutes, among a maze of other regulations. It is important for interventionalists to understand and also be able to invest in protected and approved investments and also be involved in business dealings which are within the law. Various reasons include: decreasing reimbursements by Medicare, Medicaid, managed care, and all other third-party payors; increased competition in providing interventional pain management; increasing costs of overhead and doing business; the popularity of interventional pain management, leading each and every pain physician to want to provide the service; concerns in multiple settings, including offices, ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), hospitals, private practices, and academic settings; and finally, the failure to develop strategies to remove oneself from questionable investments and business associations. Self-referrals occur when physicians refer to medical facilities in which they have financial interest. Multiple concerns related to self-referral, including conflict of interest and increased costs to the Medicare program, resulted in a ban on self-referral arrangements for clinical laboratory services under the Medicare program in 1989 known as Stark I. In 1993, the Stark I prohibition on self-referrals by physicians expanded to include 10 additional healthcare services known as designated health services or DHS. The 1993 expansion of Stark I was enacted in 1995 as Stark II. In 2007, CMS adopted Phase III of the regulations interpreting Stark II. Phase III made multiple changes and clarified many previous issues, and it becomes effective December 4, 2007. While it is mandatory to obtain expert legal advice and this manuscript in no way provides the extensive navigation required through the maze of Stark laws and other anti-kickback statutes, it is incumbent on interventionalists in all settings of practice to have appropriate knowledge of the Stark laws and exceptions and of the anti-kickback statute and safe harbors. Penalties for violating the Stark laws are severe, including fines of up to $15,000 per service and the economic threat of exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs, which may result in exclusion of any type of healthcare program and loss of privileges at hospitals and surgery centers. This manuscript reviews physician practices in general, physician payments, and self-referral patterns in particular, the evolution of the Stark law and regulations and its implications for physician practices. This article is not, and should not be, construed as legal advice or an opinion on specific situations.

References Powered by Scopus

Health spending projections through 2016: Modest changes obscure part D's impact

120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consequences of Physicians' Ownership of Health Care Facilities — Joint Ventures in Radiation Therapy

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physician Ownership of Physical Therapy Services: Effects on Charges, Utilization, Profits, and Service Characteristics

92Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An unhealthy public-private tension: Pharmacy ownership, prescribing, and spending in the Philippines

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Update and overview of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy regulations and reimbursement

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Negative Impact of Stark Law Exemptions on Graduate Medical Education and Health Care Costs: The Example of Radiation Oncology

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manchikanti, L., & McMahon, E. B. (2007). Physician refer thyself: Is Stark II, phase III the final voyage? Pain Physician. American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians. https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2007/10/725

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

77%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Researcher 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

81%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

10%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

5%

Computer Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free