Selection bias in estimating the relationship between prolonged ED boarding and mortality in emergency critical care patients

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Studies have found that prolonged boarding time for intensive care unit (ICU) patients in the emergency department (ED) is associated with higher in-hospital mortality. However, these studies introduced selection bias by excluding patients with ICU admission orders who were downgraded and never arrived in the ICU. Consequently, they may overestimate mortality in prolonged ED boarders. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study at a single center covering the period from August 14, 2015 to August 13, 2019. Adult ED patients with medical ICU admission orders and at least 6 hours of subsequent critical care in either the ED or the ICU were included. Patients were classified as having either prolonged (>6 hours) or non-prolonged (≤6 hours) ED boarding. Downgraded patients were identified, and mortality was compared, both including and excluding downgraded patients. Results: Of 1862 patients, 612 (32.9%) had prolonged boarding; at 6 hours after ICU admission order entry, they were still in the ED. The remaining 1250 (67.1%) had non-prolonged boarding; at 6 hours after the ICU admission order entry, they were already in the ICU. In-hospital mortality in the non-prolonged boarding group was 18.9%. In the prolonged boarding group, 296 (48.4%) patients were downgraded in the ED and never arrived in the ICU. Including these ED downgrades, the mortality in the prolonged boarding group was 13.4% (risk difference -5.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -8.9% to -2.0%, P = 0.0031). When we excluded downgrades, the mortality in the prolonged boarding group increased to 17.4% (risk difference -1.5%, 95% CI -6.2% to 3.2%, P = 0.5720). The lower mortality in the prolonged group was attributable to lower severity of illness (mean emergency critical care SOFA [eccSOFA] difference: -0.8, 95% CI -1.1 to -0.4, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Excluding critical care patients who were downgraded in the ED leads to selection bias and overestimation of mortality among prolonged ED boarders.

References Powered by Scopus

Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: Example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes

868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of delayed transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit

808Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of delayed admission to intensive care units on mortality of critically ill patients: A cohort study

320Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Emergency critical care—overview of the literature and current concepts

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Boarding in the emergency department: Challenges and mitigation strategies

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gardner, K., Gordon, A. J., Shannon, B., Nesbitt, J., Wilson, J. G., Mitarai, T., & Kohn, M. A. (2022). Selection bias in estimating the relationship between prolonged ED boarding and mortality in emergency critical care patients. JACEP Open, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12667

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

67%

Sports and Recreations 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free