Mono3D++: Monocular 3D vehicle detection with two-scale 3D hypotheses and task priors

100Citations
Citations of this article
130Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a method to infer 3D pose and shape of vehicles from a single image. To tackle this ill-posed problem, we optimize two-scale projection consistency between the generated 3D hypotheses and their 2D pseudo-measurements. Specifically, we use a morphable wireframe model to generate a fine-scaled representation of vehicle shape and pose. To reduce its sensitivity to 2D landmarks, we jointly model the 3D bounding box as a coarse representation which improves robustness. We also integrate three task priors, including unsupervised monocular depth, a ground plane constraint as well as vehicle shape priors, with forward projection errors into an overall energy function.

References Powered by Scopus

Deep residual learning for image recognition

178196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity

45470Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection

30663Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?

242Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Survey

151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

He, T., & Soatto, S. (2019). Mono3D++: Monocular 3D vehicle detection with two-scale 3D hypotheses and task priors. In 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, 31st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019 and the 9th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019 (pp. 8409–8416). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33018409

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 60

79%

Researcher 13

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 65

77%

Engineering 17

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

1%

Mathematics 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0