Gene specificity of suppression of transgene-mediated insertional transcriptional activation by the chicken HS4 insulator

19Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Insertional mutagenesis has emerged as a major obstacle for gene therapy based on vectors that integrate randomly in the genome. Reducing the genotoxicity of genomic viral integration can, in first approximation, be equated with reducing the risk of oncogene activation, at least in the case of therapeutic payloads that have no known oncogenic potential, such as the globin genes. An attractive solution to the problem of oncogene activation is the inclusion of insulators/enhancer-blockers in the viral vectors. In this study we have used Recombinase-Mediated Cassette Exchange to characterize the effect of integration of globin therapeutic cassettes in the presence or absence of the chicken HS4 and three other putative insulators inserted near Stil, Tal1 and MAP17, three well-known cellular proto-oncogenes in the SCL/Tal1 locus. We show that insertion of a Locus Control Region-driven globin therapeutic globin transgene had a dramatic activating effect on Tal1 and Map17, the two closest genes, a minor effect on Stil, and no effect on Cyp4x1, a non-expressed gene. Of the four element tested, cHS4 was the only one that was able to suppress this transgene-mediated insertional transcriptional activation. cHS4 had a strong suppressive effect on the activation expression of Map17 but has little or no effect on expression of Tal1. The suppressive activity of cHS4 is therefore promoter specific. Importantly, the observed suppressive effect of cHS4 on Map17 activation did not depend on its intercalation between the LCR and the Map 17 promoter. Rather, presence of one or two copies of cHS4 anywhere within the transgene was sufficient to almost completely block the activation of Map17. Therefore, at this complex locus, suppression of transgene-mediated insertional transcriptional activation by cHS4 could not be adequately explained by models that predict that cHS4 can only suppress expression through an enhancer-blocking activity that requires intercalation between an enhancer and a promoter. This has important implications for our theoretical understanding of the possible effects of the insertion of cHS4 on gene therapy vectors. We also show that cHS4 decreased the level of expression of the globin transgene. Therefore, the benefits of partially preventing insertional gene activation are in part negated by the lower expression level of the transgene. A cost/ benefit analysis of the utility of incorporation of insulators in gene therapy vectors will require further studies in which the effects of insulators on both the therapeutic gene and the flanking genes are determined at a large number of integration sites. Identification of insulators with minimal promoter specificity would also be of great value. © 2009 Desprat, Bouhassira.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Insertion of cassette 234-b-EGFP activates genes near the RL5 integration site: A: Structure of the region around the RL5 integration site on chromosome 4. The integration site RL5 is located at Chr 4: position 114756771 (mouse build July 2007 (mm9) assembly). B: Schematic of the RMCE reactions. The numbers above the gene represent the average increase in levels of expression of the flanking genes after insertion of the 234-b-EGFP cassette at RL5. Both orientations are represented. The black triangle represents the two inverted Lox sites. Fold increases were calculated relative to the b-2-microglobulin gene and relative to the expression of the same gene when the control cDNA cassette was inserted at the same locus (see methods). C: Histogram summarizing the increase of the flanking genes (6standard deviation). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005956.g001
  • Figure 2. The cHS4 insulator block activation of Map17 but not Tal1. A: PCR analysis demonstrating insertion of 5 cassettes at RL5 in each orientation (see methods). At least 2 clones in each orientation are shown. B and C: Schematic of the structure of RL5 loci in the presence of the various tested cassettes in each orientation, and histograms illustrating the average activation (6standard deviation) of the flanking genes (relative to the control cDNA cassette). D: FACS Analysis: Whisker plots of the mean linear fluorescence of 5 to 15 clones containing cassette 234-b-EGFP flanked on either sides or on both sides by the 2.4 kb cHS4 insulator. Presence of one insulator decreases EGFP expression by more than 2-fold. Presence of 2 insulators has an even more pronounced effect. E: Histograms illustrating a Q-PCR analysis of EGFP expression of the clones analyzed by FACS in Figure 3A. The RT-PCR results are similar to the FACS results. EGFP expression was normalized to expression of the b-2-microglobulin gene. The effect of the insulator was independent of its location within the cassette and of the orientation of the cassette in the locus. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005956.g002
  • Figure 3. Insertion of hHS4, hHS5 and hG8 repeat do not block activation of Tal1 and Map17. A: PCR analysis demonstrating insertion of the various cassettes. B and C: Diagram illustrating the structure of the RL5 region after insertion of the various cassettes and histograms summarizing Q-RT-PCR determinations of the average fold increases (6standard deviation) of the flanking genes relative to the cDNA control cassette. The three cassettes tested had minimal effects on expression of Tal1 and Map17. The black bars represent the fold increase of the 234-b-EGFP cassette with and without cHS4 which was used as a control in this experiment. D and E: FACS and Q-RT-PCR analyses of EGFP expression (see Figure 3D and 3E) when cassettes 234-b-EGFP plus hHS4, hHS5 or G8 were inserted at RL5. Levels of expression in the presence of HS5, HS4 and G8 are respectively lower or higher than the controls both at the protein and mRNA levels. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005956.g003
  • Figure 4. Orientation-dependent silencing of b-EGFP expression in the presence of the G8 repeats. A: Dot-plots illustrating EGFP expression of representative clones one or three months after RMCE. X-axis: forward-scatter; y-axis: FL-1 (EGFP) fluorescence. The horizontal line represents the level of auto-fluorescence of non-tranfected control MEL cells. Presence of one copy of G8 39 of EGFP, or of two flanking copies of G8 caused silencing of the transgene in the N but not in the P orientation. B: Q-RT-PCR analysis of EGFP expression demonstrating that the silencing induced by the G8 repeats occurs at the mRNA level. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005956.g004
  • Table 1. Primers to determine orientation.
  • Table 2. DNA segment inserted in the various cassettes used in this study.
  • Table 3. primer used for RT-PCR.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Desprat, R., & Bouhassira, E. E. (2009). Gene specificity of suppression of transgene-mediated insertional transcriptional activation by the chicken HS4 insulator. PLoS ONE, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005956

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

47%

Researcher 12

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20

63%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 9

28%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

6%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0