Treatment patterns and costs among biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics for psoriatic arthritis

9Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: We evaluated treatment patterns and healthcare costs of initiating psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment with oral apremilast versus biologics. Methods: Claims data identified biologic-naive adults with PsA who initiated either apremilast or a biologic from 2013 to 2016. Results: Medication adherence was similar at 12 months (76.9 vs 73.4%; p = 0.175) between apremilast (n = 381) and matched biologic (n = 761) patients. Apremilast users had $12,715 lower total costs per-patient-per-month (p < 0.001), largely due to outpatient pharmacy and medical costs. Conclusion: Commercially insured patients with PsA initiating apremilast had adherence similar to those initiating biologics but lower total healthcare costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feldman, S. R., Pelletier, C. L., Wilson, K. L., Mehta, R. K., Brouillette, M. A., Smith, D., & Bonafede, M. M. (2019). Treatment patterns and costs among biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics for psoriatic arthritis. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 8(9), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2019-0034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free