Sensitive determination of cannabinoids in whole blood by LC-MS-MS after rapid removal of phospholipids by filtration

29Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Direct analysis of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and other cannabinoids in crude acetonitrile extracts of whole blood by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using pneumatically assisted electrospray ionization (LC-ESI-MS-MS) was subjected to pronounced ion suppression from co-eluting phospholipids (PLs). The interferences were mainly caused by the lysophosphatidylcholine and lysophosphatidylethanolamine classes of PLs. The PLs were easily removed from crude extracts by filtration through a sorbent with Lewis acid properties, which typically increased the THC and cannabinol (CBN) signal intensities by a factor of 5. Based on this technique, a simple highthroughput LC-MS-MS method was developed for the determination of cannabinoids in 100 μL samples of whole blood. The lower limits of quantification were 0.2 μg/L for THC, CBN, cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid A (THCA-A) and 0.5 μg/L for 11-hydroxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-OH) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH). The mean ion suppression levels after clean-up were 10% (THC), 9% (CBN), 17% (CBD), 0% (THC-OH), 2% (THC-COOH) and 9% (THCA-A) at blood concentration levels of 1-10 μg/L. The mean true extraction recoveries were 97% (THC), 101% (CBN), 101% (CBD), 98% (THC-OH), 95% (THC-COOH) and 90% (THCA-A) at the same concentration levels. The relative intra-laboratory reproducibility standard deviations were <9% at concentrations of 1 μg/L or higher. The trueness expressed as the relative bias of the test results was within ±4% at concentrations of 1 μg/L or higher.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sørensen, L. K., & Hasselstrøm, J. B. (2017). Sensitive determination of cannabinoids in whole blood by LC-MS-MS after rapid removal of phospholipids by filtration. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 41(5), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkx030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free