Protective effects of ascorbic acid on behavior and oxidative status of restraint-stressed mice

77Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated an association between stressful conditions and the onset of clinical depression. Considering the antidepressant-like properties of ascorbic acid in both experimental and clinical approaches, we evaluated the beneficial effect of this vitamin on restraint stress-induced behavioral and neurochemical alterations. Acute restraint stress caused a depressive-like behavior in the forced swimming test, accompanied by increased lipid peroxidation (cerebral cortex and hippocampus); increased superoxide dismutase (cerebral cortex and hippocampus), glutathione reductase (cerebral cortex), and glutathione peroxidase (cerebral cortex and hippocampus) activities; and elevated expression of Bcl-2 (hippocampus). Oral administration of ascorbic acid (1 mg/kg) or fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) 1 h before restraint stress prevented the stress-induced increase on immobility time in the forced swimming test. Moreover, this vitamin reduced lipid peroxidation to control levels and restored the activity of superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase, and glutathione peroxidase. Ascorbic acid had no effect on the increased level of Bcl-2 induced by stress. Glutathione levels, glycogen synthase kinase-3β phosphorylation, and Bax expression were not altered by stress or ascorbic acid administration. Besides reinforcing the antioxidant potential of ascorbic acid, our results support the notion that oxidative stress plays a role in the pathogenesis and treatment of stress-induced depression. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moretti, M., Budni, J., Dos Santos, D. B., Antunes, A., Daufenbach, J. F., Manosso, L. M., … Rodrigues, A. L. S. (2013). Protective effects of ascorbic acid on behavior and oxidative status of restraint-stressed mice. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, 49(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-012-9892-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free