I propose some changes to the conceptions of argument and of argumentative discussion in Ralph Johnson’s Manifest Rationality (2000). An argument is a discourse whose author seeks to persuade an audience to accept a thesis by producing reasons in support of it and discharging his dialectical obligations. An argumentative discussion (what Johnson calls ‘argumentation’) is a sociocultural activity of constructing, presenting, interpreting, criticizing, and revising arguments for the purpose of reaching a shared rationally supported position on some issue. Johnson’s theory of argumentative discussion, with occasional modifications, is derived from this definition as a sequence of 17 theorems. Argumentative discussion is a valuable cultural practice; it is the most secure route to correct views and wise policies.
CITATION STYLE
Hitchcock, D. (2017). The Practice of Argumentative Discussion. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 30, pp. 323–334). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_20
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.