Indices, meaning and topic maps: Some observations

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Topic Maps were initially developed as an indexing tool, and many of the subsequent issues addressed by Topic Map research has reflected this initial focus. However, in regard to the semantic aspects of Topic Maps, indexing appears to have fallen by the wayside, replaced largely by formalised techniques, typically first-order logics. To some extent, this is supported by the literature on indexing itself, where treatment of semantic aspects is generally minimal, or completely absent; even when discussion does occur, it tends to be flawed by the adoption of a perspective inappropriate to the communicative situation which characterises the raison d'être of any index. On the other hand, philosophers and semioticians have long recognised the importance of indices as semantic devices. By examining two key discussions on the nature of indices: C.S.Peirce's account of the index within the context of his theory of signs, and Martin Heidegger's account of signs and Verweisung within the context of his unfolding of being-in-the-world, it is possible to begin plotting how a deeper understanding of the nature of indices can assist in developing the semantic potential of the Topic Maps technology. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, T., & Thomas, H. (2007). Indices, meaning and topic maps: Some observations. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4438 LNAI, pp. 130–139). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71945-8_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free