Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the physical, mental, and social health levels among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Methods: We sampled from 34 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries and divided physical, mental, and social health into three domains based on World Health Organization health definitions. Results: A multivariate hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to group countries that were similar in terms of health. Regarding physical health, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and ten more countries reported favorable health conditions. For mental health, Australia, Canada and eight more countries revealed favorable conditions. Finally, in terms of social health, Austria, Finland, Iceland, and seven more countries reported favorable conditions. Sweden and Switzerland reported the best health conditions aggregated across all three domains. Conversely, Estonia, Hungary, and Turkey reported comparatively poorer health across all three domains when compared with other Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Conclusions: We suggested that mental health policy should be further strengthened in cases of Korea and Japan. In case of the Eastern Bloc countries, health policies should be established focusing on health equity for effective improvement of indicators.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, M. B., Nam, E. W., Kim, C. B., Lee, H. J., Lee, K. S., & Koh, S. B. (2018). Favorable and unfavorable health conditions within OECD countries: An exploratory study. SAGE Open Medicine, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117753847

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 6

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 2

33%

Neuroscience 2

33%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0