Mixed Methodologies: A New Research Paradigm or Enhanced Quantitative Paradigm

  • Morris E
  • Burkett K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) nursing studies in order to evaluate the rigor of each method used within a single study. Qualitative methodologies were evaluated utilizing standard evaluation criteria including credibility, confirmability, meaning in context , recurrent patterning, transferability and saturation in order to assess the vigor and truthfulness of the qualitative method. Quantitative studies were judged for rigor and strength based on validity, reliability and gen-eralizability. CINAHL database was searched for nursing studies conducted over a three year period using mixed method(s) and nursing as the search terms. The search strategy yielded 53 mixed methods research studies which were primarily deductive in nature using open ended semi-structured questions to explain the quantitative data. These authors concluded that mixed methodological studies in the current literature are descriptive quantitative studies and do not employ qualitative methodologies.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morris, E., & Burkett, K. (2011). Mixed Methodologies: A New Research Paradigm or Enhanced Quantitative Paradigm. Online Journal of Cultural Competence in Nursing and Healthcare, 1(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.9730/ojccnh.org/v1n1a3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

78%

Researcher 4

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

32%

Computer Science 5

26%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free