Big Game, Small Game: Why It Matters

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Though today the assumption that “bigger equals better” when it comes to animal prey is often equated with optimal foraging theory, this expectation has long been present in archaeolology. In this chapter, I explore the history of the bigger is better concept and its relationship to the Broad Spectrum Revolution hypothesis. I review initial approaches to the Broad Spectrum Revolution and then turn to more recent studies, including both prey choice and niche construction perspectives on the transition to broad spectrum diets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jones, E. L. (2016). Big Game, Small Game: Why It Matters. In SpringerBriefs in Archaeology (pp. 9–22). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22351-3_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free