Countryside vs city: A user-centered approach to open spatial indicators of urban sprawl

14Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The interplay between land take and climate change is reviving the debate on the environmental impacts of urbanization. Monitoring and evaluation of land-cover and land-use changes have secured political commitment worldwide, and in the European Union in particular – following the agreement on a “no net land take by 2050” target. This paper addresses the ensuing challenges by investigating how open data services and spatial indicators may help manage urban sprawl more effectively. Experts, scholars, students and local government officials were engaged in a living lab exercise centered around the uptake of geospatial data in planning, policy making and design processes. Main findings point to a great potential, and pressing need, for open spatial data services in mainstreaming sustainable land use practices. However, urban sprawl’s elusiveness calls for interactive approaches, since the actual usability of proposed tools needs to be carefully investigated and planned for.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bonifazi, A., Sannicandro, V., Attardi, R., Di Cugno, G., & Torre, C. M. (2016). Countryside vs city: A user-centered approach to open spatial indicators of urban sprawl. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9789, pp. 161–176). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42089-9_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free