Assessing the uptake of incentivised physical health checks for people with serious mental illness: a cohort study in primary care

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background People with serious mental illness are more likely to experience physical illnesses. The onset of many of these illnesses can be prevented if detected early. Physical health screening for people with serious mental illness is incentivised in primary care in England through the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). GPs are paid to conduct annual physical health checks on patients with serious mental illness, including checks of body mass index (BMI), cholesterol, and alcohol consumption. Aim To assess the impact of removing and reintroducing QOF financial incentives on uptake of three physical health checks (BMI, cholesterol, and alcohol consumption) for patients with serious mental illness. Design and setting Cohort study using UK primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between April 2011 and March 2020. Method A difference-in-difference analysis was employed to compare differences in the uptake of physical health checks before and after the intervention, accounting for relevant observed and unobserved confounders. Results An immediate change was found in uptake after physical health checks were removed from, and after they were added back to, the QOF list. For BMI, cholesterol, and alcohol checks, the overall impact of removal was a reduction in uptake of 14.3, 6.8, and 11.9 percentage points, respectively. The reintroduction of BMI screening in the QOF increased the uptake by 10.2 percentage points. Conclusion This analysis supports the hypothesis that QOF incentives lead to better uptake of physical health checks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matias, M. A., Jacobs, R., Aragón, M. J., Fernandes, L., Gutacker, N., Siddiqi, N., & Kasteridis, P. (2024). Assessing the uptake of incentivised physical health checks for people with serious mental illness: a cohort study in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 74(744), e449–e455. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0532

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free