Characterization of airway inflammation after repeated exposures to occupational agents

64Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the comparative kinetics of eosinophil recruitment after exposure to low- and high-molecular-weight sensitizers in subjects with occupational asthma (OA). Objectives: The aims of the study were to investigate the kinetics of changes in inflammatory mediators associated with eosinophil infiltration (IL-5 and eotaxin) and to examine the nature of the airway inflammation induced in response to different types of occupational agents. Methods: We investigated 15 subjects with OA caused by high- and low-molecular-weight agents. The subjects were exposed to increasing doses of the relevant occupational agent over 3 to 4 days until a 20% fall in FEV1 occurred. Methacholine challenge and sputum induction were performed at the end of each day of exposure. Sputum samples were assessed for differential cell counts, including eosinophils, IL-5, and eotaxin messenger RNA. Results: There was an increase in sputum eosinophils, eotaxin, and IL-5 on the day preceding the occurrence of asthmatic reaction, although there was no change in functional parameters (FEV1 and PC20). Increase in sputum eosinophils was more prominent in subjects exposed to low-molecular-weight agents than to high-molecular-weight agents. Conclusion: Changes in eosinophils, IL-5, and eotaxin precede functional changes after exposure to occupational agents in subjects with OA. Eosinophil inflammation is a feature of exposure to both high- and low-molecular-weight agents. Induced sputum may be a useful tool in the early diagnosis of OA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lemière, C., Chaboilliez, S., Trudeau, C., Taha, R., Maghni, K., Martin, J. G., & Hamid, Q. (2000). Characterization of airway inflammation after repeated exposures to occupational agents. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 106(6), 1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2000.111235

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free