Reviewing the Role of Key Performance Indicators in Architectural and Urban Design Practices

8Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Energy use and relative CO2 emissions drive climate change that affects both the environment and human health. Extreme events caused by climate change, such as heat waves, flooding, and droughts are increasingly frequent and dangerous and the quality of life in cities is progressively decreasing. The building sector is among the most energy intensive sectors and mitigation and adaptation strategies are needed to reduce the emissions and impacts of climate change. This article presents a literature review created using the SCOPUS database on 515 articles setup to investigate the role of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in architectural and urban design processes and to understand how KPIs can be used to improve sustainability in the design of buildings and cities. Findings from the literature review highlights the potentiality of KPIs as a tool for managing complexity and for measure performances starting from the early design stages up to the lifetime of buildings and, in general, design. In parallel, the analysis of results showed that KPIs are commonly used to evaluate performance at a very different scale, but the building scale is the most considered. The use of KPIs in architecture, focusing on sustainability, should be implemented more in the future to allow for a better control of architectural performances.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Scopus database: A review

770Citations
1171Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mosca, F., & Perini, K. (2022, November 1). Reviewing the Role of Key Performance Indicators in Architectural and Urban Design Practices. Sustainability (Switzerland). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114464

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

48%

Researcher 12

41%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 11

42%

Design 6

23%

Arts and Humanities 6

23%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0