Prosthetic Materials and Adhesion Formation

  • Annibali R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Fibrovascular adhesions are found in 50 to 95{%} of patients who have undergone open abdominal surgery.I-3 Mechanical trauma, thermal injury, infections, tissue ischemia, and foreign materials are the most important contributing causes of adhesion forma-tion. 4 Foreign bodies have been reported in 61 to 69{%} of post-operative adhesions. In 50 to 68{%} of cases the foreign material was talc; other materials included sutures, cotton lint, filaments from dressings, starch, extruded gut contents, and prosthetic im-plants. Combinations of different materials have also been noted (usually talc and thread).2.5 The common pathway leading to adhesion formation is in-flammation, which produces exudates containing high quantities of fibrinogen. 6--8 Fibrin clots develop and cause adhesions, at least temporarily, between surfaces otherwise unattached. Granulation tissue results after colonization of the fibrin network by fibroblasts, macrophages, and new blood vessels. A healthy and well-vascular-ized peritoneum has an effective fibrinolytic system due to a plas-minogen activator, which is able to completely absorb the newly developed fibrinous attachments. 4 • 9 Prosthetic materials can con-siderably impair the fibrinolytic activity by two different mecha-nisms: 1. Tight suturing and grafting induce peritoneal ischemia. Is-chemic tissues are potent stimuli to adhesion formation and ac-tively inhibit fibrinolysis in adjacent peritoneal tissue. 6 .8-11 Thus, retention of vascularization is essential for proper, adhesion-free peritoneal healing.6.I2.I3 2. Mesothelial cell proliferation seems to be another inhibitor of adhesion formation 14 .I5; its reduction, observed in infected wounds and in those where a prosthetic mesh is applied, cor-responds with a decreased fibrinolytic activity.I5 A number of experimental and clinical studies have been con-ducted to better understand the mechanism of adhesion forma-tion and prevention. One of the major difficulties encountered has been the development of an animal model that could be re-producible, quantifiable, and reliable. The rabbit uterine horn model has gained widespread popularity.I6 This model involves a traumatic deperitonealization of the rabbit uterine horn. The re-sulting raw surface can develop adhesions with other raw surfaces within the abdominal cavity in approximately 2 weeks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Annibali, R. (2001). Prosthetic Materials and Adhesion Formation. In Abdominal Wall Hernias (pp. 294–298). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8574-3_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free