The incidence of clinically diagnosed versus research-identified autism in olmsted county, minnesota, 1976-1997: Results from a retrospective, population-based study

34Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Autism prevalence studies have often relied on administrative prevalence or clinical diagnosis as case-identification strategies. We report the incidence of clinical diagnoses of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), versus research-identified autism among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, age =21 years, from 1976-1997. The incidence of clinically diagnosed ASD (with 95% CI) was 1.5 per 100,000 (0.0-3.7) in 1980-1983 and 33.1 (22.8-43.3) in 1995-1997, a 22.1-fold increase. In contrast, the incidence of research-identified autism increased from 5.5 (1.4-9.5) per 100,000 to 44.9 (32.9-56.9), an 8.2-fold increase. Only 46.8% of research-identified cases received a clinical diagnosis of ASD. These findings demonstrate the potential for misleading interpretation of results from epidemiologic studies that rely on clinical diagnosis of autism to identify cases. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barbaresi, W. J., Colligan, R. C., Weaver, A. L., & Katusic, S. K. (2009). The incidence of clinically diagnosed versus research-identified autism in olmsted county, minnesota, 1976-1997: Results from a retrospective, population-based study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(3), 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0645-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free