A Comparison of Real-Time Compression Ultrasonography with Impedance Plethysmography for the Diagnosis of Deep-Vein Thrombosis in Symptomatic Outpatients

  • Heijboer H
  • Buller H
  • Lensing A
  • et al.
365Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impedance plethysmography performed serially over a one-week period has been shown to be an effective diagnostic strategy for patients with clinically suspected acute deep-vein thrombosis. Compression ultrasonography has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of proximal-vein thrombosis. The clinical value of repeated ultrasonography in the management of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial in 985 consecutive outpatients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis to compare the diagnostic value of serial impedance plethysmography (494 patients) and serial compression ultrasonography (491 patients). We compared the positive predictive values of both tests for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis, using contrast venography as a reference. The frequencies of venous thromboembolism during a six-month follow-up period were also compared in patients with repeatedly normal results in order to evaluate the safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy from such patients. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of an abnormal ultrasonogram was 94 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 87 to 98 percent), whereas the predictive value of impedance plethysmography was 83 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 75 to 90 percent) (P = 0.02). In patients with repeatedly normal results, the incidence of venous thromboembolism during the six-month follow-up period was 1.5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 3.3 percent) for serial compression ultrasonography, as compared with 2.5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.6 percent) for serial impedance plethysmography. CONCLUSIONS: In making the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients, serial compression ultrasonography is preferable to impedance plethysmography, in view of its superior performance in detecting venous thrombosis.

References Powered by Scopus

Detection of Deep-Vein Thrombosis by Real-Time B-Mode Ultrasonography

852Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Roentgen Diagnosis of Venous Thrombosis in the Leg

693Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Serial Impedance Plethysmography for Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis in Outpatients

313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis

1313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home

1222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management

1059Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heijboer, H., Buller, H. R., Lensing, A., Turpie, A., Colly, L. P., & ten Cate, J. W. (1993). A Comparison of Real-Time Compression Ultrasonography with Impedance Plethysmography for the Diagnosis of Deep-Vein Thrombosis in Symptomatic Outpatients. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(19), 1365–1369. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199311043291901

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘16‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

21%

Researcher 3

21%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

58%

Engineering 2

17%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

17%

Computer Science 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0