Exercise training studies have been conducted to increase physical activity (PA) in overweight, sedentary individuals. More recently, sedentary time reduction (STR) interventions have targeted decreases in sedentary behavior (SB). Short-term changes in these behaviors may occur; however, follow-up evaluations are not commonly done. PURPOSE : To determine if maintenance in PA and SB 3-months following a training study is better in a STR, exercise only (EX), or exercise and STR (EX-STR) group. METHODS: Overweight/obese (n=47) individuals completed a 3-month training study. Participants were randomized into 1 of 3 groups: 1) STR: met weekly with a researcher who gave recommendations to reduce SB and increase PA, 2) EX: exercised 5 days/week, and 3) EX-STR: combination of EX and STR. The interventions were effective in eliciting behavioral change from baseline to 3-months. Thirty-one participants (BMI= 33.6+ 4.58 kg∙m-2; age= 45.2+10.19 years) agreed to the followup. Participants wore an activPAL(AP) monitor at end of study (M3) and 3-months post-study (M6). The AP recorded time spent sitting/lying, standing, and stepping. Percent sedentary (%SED) was calculated as sitting time/monitor wear time. Steps/day (surrogate for PA) were also determined. Linear mixed effects models were used to test for differences in %SED and steps within and between groups. RESULTS : EX and STR maintained %SED and EX-STR did not. %SED was significantly higher in EX than STR at M6. The % change from M3 to M6 in steps/day for STR, EX, and EX- STR was 22.8, 26, and 43.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION : These data suggest it may be more feasible to sustain reductions in %SED following an STR than maintaining an increase in PA following exercise training.
CITATION STYLE
Abst D-FreeCommPosters. (2012). Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44(5S), 267–958. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000417529.22755.ed
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.