Risk–Benefit Analysis of the 9-Valent HPV Vaccination for Adolescent Boys from an Individual Perspective

2Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Japan recently approved a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for males, but the 9-valent vaccine has only been approved for females. Given the low female vaccination rate due to concerns about adverse events in Japan, quantifying the risks and benefits of the HPV vaccination for males may help in deciding whether to vaccinate adolescent boys in Japan. Using quality-adjusted life years, the risk–benefit ratio for an adolescent boy receiving the 9-valent HPV vaccination was calculated. The male HPV vaccination reduced the QALYs gained due to head and neck cancer, anal cancer, penile cancer, genital warts, and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis by 401.63, 20.38, 9.40, 28.79, and 69.13 per 100,000 vaccinated persons, respectively. The total risk of vaccination was 11.85. The risk–benefit ratio for a 12-year-old boy who received the HPV vaccination series was found to be 0.022 (benefit–risk ratio, 44.670). In the sensitivity analysis, the risk–benefit ratio ranged from 0.0001 to 0.11 for all scenarios. Hence, much larger benefits than risks linked with the male HPV vaccination were observed from an individual perspective. The results support the inclusion of sex-neutral HPV vaccinations into the national immunization program as well as strengthens the decision for adolescent boys to receive the vaccination.

References Powered by Scopus

380Citations
84Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Side effects of vaccines

0Citations
25Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kitano, T. (2022). Risk–Benefit Analysis of the 9-Valent HPV Vaccination for Adolescent Boys from an Individual Perspective. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 75(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2021.367

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

11%

Social Sciences 1

11%

Psychology 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0