Spatiotemporal patterns in urbanization efficiency within the Yangtze River Economic Belt between 2005 and 2014

196Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The question of how to generate maximum socio-economic benefits while at the same time minimizing input from urban land resources lies at the core of regional ecological civilization construction. We apply stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) in this study to municipal input-output data for the period between 2005 and 2014 to evaluate the urbanization efficiency of 110 cities within the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) and then further assess the spatial association characteristics of these values. The results of this study initially reveal that the urbanization efficiency of the YREB increased from 0.34 to 0.53 between 2005 and 2014, a significant growth at a cumulative rate of 54.07%. Data show that the efficiency growth rate of cities within the upper reaches of the Yangtze River has been faster than that of their counterparts in the middle and lower reaches, and that there is also a great deal of additional potential for growth in urbanization efficiency across the whole area. Secondly, results show that urbanization efficiency conforms to a “bar-like” distribution across the whole area, gradually decreasing from the east to the west. This trend highlights great intra-provincial differences, but also striking inter-provincial variation within the upper, middle, and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. The total urbanization efficiency of cities within the lower reaches of the river has been the highest, followed successively by those within the middle and upper reaches. Finally, values for Moran’s I within this area remained higher than zero over the study period and have increased annually; this result indicates a positive spatial correlation between the urbanization efficiency of cities and annual increments in agglomeration level. Our use of the local indicators of spatial association (LISA) statistic has enabled us to quantify characteristics of “small agglomeration and large dispersion”. Thus, “high- high” (H-H) agglomeration areas can be seen to have spread outwards from around Zhejiang Province and the city of Shanghai, while areas characterized by “low-low” (L-L) patterns are mainly concentrated in the north of Anhui Province and in Sichuan Province. The framework and results of this research are of considerable significance to our understanding of both land use sustainability and balanced development.

References Powered by Scopus

Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA

9088Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models

6220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data

3669Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Identifying the impacts of natural and human factors on ecosystem service in the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins

281Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trade-offs in land-use competition and sustainable land development in the North China Plain

190Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic interactive effects of urban land-use efficiency, industrial transformation, and carbon emissions

173Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jin, G., Deng, X., Zhao, X., Guo, B., & Yang, J. (2018). Spatiotemporal patterns in urbanization efficiency within the Yangtze River Economic Belt between 2005 and 2014. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(8), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1545-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

10%

Researcher 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 9

50%

Engineering 4

22%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

17%

Social Sciences 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free