Number of Patient Encounters in Emergency Medicine Residency Does Not Correlate with In-Training Exam Domain Scores

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency medicine (EM) residents take the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) In-Training Examination (ITE) every year. This examination is based on the ABEM Model of Clinical Practice (Model). The purpose of this study was to determine whether a relationship exists between the number of patient encounters a resident sees within a specific clinical domain and their ITE performance on questions that are related to that domain. Methods: Chief complaint data for each patient encounter was taken from the electronic health record for EM residents graduating in three consecutive years between 2016-2021. We excluded patient encounters without an assigned resident or a listed chief complaint. Chief complaints were then categorized into one of 20 domains based on the 2016 Model. We calculated correlations between the total number of encounters seen by a resident for all clinical years and their ITE performance for the corresponding clinical domain from their third year of training. Results: Available for analysis were a total of 232,625 patient encounters and 69 eligible residents who treated the patients. We found no statistically significant correlations following Bonferroni correction for multiple analyses. Conclusion: There was no correlation between the number of patient encounters a resident has within a clinical domain and their ITE performance on questions corresponding to that domain. This suggests the need for separate but parallel educational missions to achieve success in both the clinical environment and standardized testing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kern, M. W., Jewell, C. M., Hekman, D. J., & Schnapp, B. H. (2023). Number of Patient Encounters in Emergency Medicine Residency Does Not Correlate with In-Training Exam Domain Scores. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 24(1), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.11.57997

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free