Capecitabine Monotherapy: Review of Studies in First-Line HER-2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

  • O'Shaughnessy J
  • Kaufmann M
  • Siedentopf F
  • et al.
54Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The goals of treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are to prolong overall survival (OS) while maximizing quality of life, palliating symptoms, and delaying tumor progression. For many years, anthracyclines and taxanes have been the mainstay of treatment for MBC, but these agents are now commonly administered earlier in the course of the disease. A recent meta-analysis revealed adverse effects on OS and overall response rates in patients with MBC receiving first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy following relapse on adjuvant chemotherapy. Noncrossresistant cytotoxic agents and combinations that combine high clinical activity and acceptable tolerability while being convenient for patients are therefore needed for the first-line treatment of MBC patients. Capecitabine has substantial antitumor activity in the first-line treatment of patients with MBC in prospective, randomized, phase II/III clinical trials as monotherapy and in combination with biologic and novel agents. First-line capecitabine monotherapy has a favorable safety profile, lacking myelosuppression and alopecia, and does not compromise the administration of further lines of chemotherapy. Capecitabine is suitable for long-term administration without the cumulative toxicity that can limit the prolonged use of other chemotherapy agents. Here, we review the available data on capecitabine as a single agent for first-line treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative MBC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Shaughnessy, J. A., Kaufmann, M., Siedentopf, F., Dalivoust, P., Debled, M., Robert, N. J., & Harbeck, N. (2012). Capecitabine Monotherapy: Review of Studies in First-Line HER-2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. The Oncologist, 17(4), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free