Balancing paediatric anaesthesia: Preclinical insights into analgesia, hypnosis, neuroprotection, and neurotoxicity

52Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Logistical and ethical reasons make conducting clinical research in paediatric practice difficult, and therefore safe and efficacious advances are dependent on good preclinical research. For example, notable advances have been made in preclinical studies of pain processing that correlate well with patient data. Other areas of paediatric anaesthetic research remain in their infancy including mechanisms of anaesthesia and anaesthetic neuroprotection and neurotoxicity. Animal data have identified the potential 'double-edged' sword of administering anaesthetic agents in the young; although these agents can be neuroprotective in certain circumstances, they can be neurotoxic in others. The potential for this toxicity must be balanced against the importance of providing adequate anaesthesia for which there can be no compromise. We review the current state of preclinical research in paediatric anaesthesia and identify areas which require further exploration in order to provide the foundations for well-conducted clinical trials. © The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanders, R. D., Ma, D., Brooks, P., & Maze, M. (2008). Balancing paediatric anaesthesia: Preclinical insights into analgesia, hypnosis, neuroprotection, and neurotoxicity. British Journal of Anaesthesia. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen263

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free