Diversification for multi-domain result sets

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Multi-domain search answers to queries spanning multiple entities, like "Find a hotel in Milan close to a concert venue, a museum and a good restaurant", by producing ranked sets of entity combinations that maximize relevance, measured by a function expressing the user's preferences. Due to the combinatorial nature of results, good entity instances (e.g., five stars hotels) tend to appear repeatedly in top-ranked combinations. To improve the quality of the result set, it is important to balance relevance with diversity, which promotes different, yet almost equally relevant, entities in the top-k combinations. This paper explores two different notions of diversity for multi-domain result sets, compares experimentally alternative algorithms for the trade-off between relevance and diversity, and performs a user study for evaluating the utility of diversification in multi-domain queries. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

References Powered by Scopus

Use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries

1996Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clustering to minimize the maximum intercluster distance

1432Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation

756Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Web information retrieval

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bozzon, A., Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P., & Tagliasacchi, M. (2012). Diversification for multi-domain result sets. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7387 LNCS, pp. 137–152). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31753-8_10

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

52%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

29%

Researcher 3

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 21

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free