Perceived exertion as a tool to self-regulate exercise in individuals with tetraplegia

36Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the use of subjective rating of perceived exertion (RPE) as a tool to self-regulate the intensity of wheelchair propulsive exercise in individuals with tetraplegia. Eight motor complete tetraplegic (C5/6 and below; ASIA Impairment Scale = A) participants completed a submaximal incremental exercise test followed by a graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak) on a wheelchair ergometer. On a separate day, a 20-min exercise bout was completed at an individualised imposed power output (PO) equating to 70 % of V̇O 2peak. On a third occasion, participants were instructed to maintain a workload equivalent to the average RPE for the 20-min imposed condition. V̇O2, heart rate (HR) and PO were measured at 1-min intervals and blood lactate concentration [BLa-] was measured at 0, 10 and 20 min. No differences (P > 0.17) were found between mean V̇O2, % V̇O2peak, HR, % HRpeak, [BLa-], velocity or PO between the imposed and RPE-regulated trials. No significant (P > 0.05) time-by-trial interaction was present for V̇O2 data. A significant interaction (P < 0.001) for the PO data represented a trend for an increase in PO from 10 min to the end of exercise during the RPE-regulated condition. However, post hoc analysis revealed none of the differences in PO across time were significant (P > 0.05). In conclusion, these findings suggest that RPE can be an effective tool for self-regulating 20 min of wheelchair propulsion in a group of trained participants with tetraplegia who are experienced in wheelchair propulsion. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paulson, T. A. W., Bishop, N. C., Leicht, C. A., & Goosey-Tolfrey, V. L. (2013). Perceived exertion as a tool to self-regulate exercise in individuals with tetraplegia. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(1), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2426-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free