Three conceptions of musical distance

24Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper considers three conceptions of musical distance (or inverse "similarity") that produce three different musico-geometrical spaces: the first, based on voice leading, yields a collection of continuous quotient spaces or orbifolds; the second, based on acoustics, gives rise to the Tonnetz and related "tuning lattices"; while the third, based on the total interval content of a group of notes, generates a six-dimensional "quality space" first described by Ian Quinn. I will show that although these three measures are in principle quite distinct, they are in practice surprisingly interrelated. This produces the challenge of determining which model is appropriate to a given music-theoretical circumstance. Since the different models can yield comparable results, unwary theorists could potentially find themselves using one type of structure (such as a tuning lattice) to investigate properties more perspicuously represented by another (for instance, voice-leading relationships). © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tymoczko, D. (2009). Three conceptions of musical distance. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 38, pp. 258–272). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02394-1_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free