Background – Headache may be due to either a primary or secondary disorder, and neuroimaging assessments can play an important role when differentiating between these types of headache. Although many studies have reported no significant differences between primary headache patients and the general population in terms of abnormal neuroimaging findings, others have shown that neuroimaging may be employed to rule out secondary causes of headache that could impact morbidity and mortality. This issue remains under debate. Thus, the present study compared the neuroimaging findings of headache patients and healthy controls. Methods – This study recruited 1070 healthy controls and 1070 primary headache patients from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital. The primary headache patients were diagnosed by computerized clinical decision support systems, and re-diagnosed by a specialist. All participants were assessed with either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The neuroimaging findings were classified as significant abnormalities, non-significant abnormalities, or normal. Results – All the significant abnormalities were found using MRI scans. Significant abnormalities were identified in 4 primary headache patients (0.58%) and 5 healthy controls (0.73%); the rate of significant abnormalities was not significant different between both groups (P >.05). Conclusions – The present study found that neuroimaging was unnecessary for the primary headache patients.
CITATION STYLE
Wang, R., Liu, R., Dong, Z., Su, H., Ao, R., Liu, Y., … Yu, S. (2019). Unnecessary Neuroimaging for Patients With Primary Headaches. Headache, 59(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13397
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.