Natural history and therapeutic strategies of post-pancreatoduodenectomy abdominal fluid collections: Ten-year experience in a single institution

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Trial Design: The aim of this study was to identify independent risk factors for post-pancreatoduodenectomy (post-PD) abdominal fluid collections (AFCs) and evaluate our management protocol on it. Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive 2064 cases who underwent PD over the past decade in 1 single center was conducted. The patients were divided into AFCs and non-AFCs group. Univariable and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors of AFCs. The AFCs group was compared with the non-AFCs group with respect to the incidence of postoperative outcomes. The characteristics of AFCs were further analyzed in terms of clinical manifestations. Results: Two thousand sixty-four cases with pancreaticoduodenectomy were recruited and 15% of them were found AFCs. Diameter of main pancreatic duct ≤3 mm was found to be an independent predictor of AFCs (P < .001), along with soft pancreatic texture (P = .002), mesenterico-portal vein resection (P < .001), and estimated intraoperative blood loss >800 mL (P < .001). The incidence of mild complications was significantly higher in AFCs group than in non-AFCs group (34% vs 20%, P < .001), whereas no significant differences were noted in the rate of severe complications between these 2 groups (15% vs 15%, P = .939). Conclusion: Enhanced drainage is recommended as an effective measure to decrease the incidence of severe complications caused by post-PD AFCs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, N., Cui, J., Yang, Z., Xiong, J., Wu, H., Wang, C., & Peng, T. (2019). Natural history and therapeutic strategies of post-pancreatoduodenectomy abdominal fluid collections: Ten-year experience in a single institution. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015792

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free