Genotype–phenotype spectrum and correlations in Xia-Gibbs syndrome: Report of five novel cases and literature review

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Xia-Gibbs syndrome (XGS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the AT-hook DNA-binding motif-containing 1 gene (AHDC1), encoding a protein with a crucial role in transcription and epigenetic regulation, axonogenesis, brain function, and neurodevelopment. AHDC1 variants possibly act through a dominant-negative mechanism and may interfere with DNA repair processes, leading to genome instability and impaired DNA translesion repair. Variants affecting residues closer to the N-terminal are thought to determine a milder phenotype with better cognitive performances. However, clean-cut genotype–phenotype correlations are still lacking. Cases: In this study, we investigated five subjects with XGS in whom exome sequencing led to the identification of five novel de novo pathogenic variants in AHDC1. All variants were extremely rare and predicted to cause a loss of protein function. The phenotype of the reported patients included developmental delay, hypotonia, and distinctive facial dysmorphisms. Additionally, uncommon clinical features were observed, including congenital hypothyroidism and peculiar skeletal abnormalities. Conclusions: In this study, we report uncommon XGS features associated with five novel truncating variants in AHDC, thus expanding the genotype and phenotypic spectrum of this complex condition. We also compared our cases to previously reported cases, discussing the current status of genotype–phenotype correlations in XGS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Romano, F., Falco, M., Cappuccio, G., Brunetti-Pierri, N., Lonardo, F., Torella, A., … Capra, V. (2022). Genotype–phenotype spectrum and correlations in Xia-Gibbs syndrome: Report of five novel cases and literature review. Birth Defects Research, 114(13), 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.2058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free