Towards a classification of biomarkers of neuropsychiatric disease: From encompass to compass

90Citations
Citations of this article
169Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is currently considerable imprecision in the nosology of biomarkers used in the study of neuropsychiatric disease. The neuropsychiatric field lags behind others such as oncology, wherein, rather than using 'biomarker' as a blanket term for a diverse range of clinical phenomena, biomarkers have been actively classified into separate categories, including prognostic and predictive tests. A similar taxonomy is proposed for neuropsychiatric diseases in which the core biology remains relatively unknown. This paper divides potential biomarkers into those of (1) risk, (2) diagnosis/trait, (3) state or acuity, (4) stage, (5) treatment response and (6) prognosis, and provides illustrative exemplars. Of course, biomarkers rely on available technology and, as we learn more about the neurobiological correlates of neuropsychiatric disorders, we will realize that the classification of biomarkers across these six categories can change, and some markers may fit into more than one category.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davis, J., Maes, M., Andreazza, A., McGrath, J. J., Tye, S. J., & Berk, M. (2015, February 1). Towards a classification of biomarkers of neuropsychiatric disease: From encompass to compass. Molecular Psychiatry. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.139

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free