Performance evaluation of simple linear iterative clustering algorithm on medical image processing

12Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC) algorithm is increasingly applied to different kinds of image processing because of its excellent perceptually meaningful characteristics. In order to better meet the needs of medical image processing and provide technical reference for SLIC on the application of medical image segmentation, two indicators of boundary accuracy and superpixel uniformity are introduced with other indicators to systematically analyze the performance of SLIC algorithm, compared with Normalized cuts and Turbopixels algorithm. The extensive experimental results show that SLIC is faster and less sensitive to the image type and the setting superpixel number than other similar algorithms such as Turbopixels and Normalized cuts algorithms. And it also has a great benefit to the boundary recall, the robustness of fuzzy boundary, the setting superpixel size and the segmentation performance on medical image segmentation.

References Powered by Scopus

Normalized cuts and image segmentation

12748Citations
4502Readers
Get full text

SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods

8223Citations
2585Readers
Get full text
1936Citations
1235Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
8Citations
2Readers
Get full text

PIMIP: An Open Source Platform for Pathology Information Management and Integration

6Citations
8Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cong, J., Wei, B., Yin, Y., Xi, X., & Zheng, Y. (2014). Performance evaluation of simple linear iterative clustering algorithm on medical image processing. In Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering (Vol. 24, pp. 3231–3238). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-141145

Readers over time

‘16‘18‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

57%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

14%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

14%

Computer Science 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0