Energy consumption evaluation of AODV and AOMDV routing protocols in mobile Ad-Hoc networks

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) are mobile, multi-hop wireless networks that can be set up anytime, anywhere without the need of pre-existing infrastructure. Due to its dynamic topology the main challenge in such networks is to design dynamic routing protocols, which are efficient in terms of consumption of energy and producing less overhead. The main emphasis of this research is upon the prominent issues of MANETs such as energy efficiency and scalability along with some traditional performance metrics for performance evaluation. Two proactive routing protocols used in this research are single-path AODV versus multi-path AOMDV. Extensive simulation has been done in NS2 simulator, which includes ten scenarios. The simulation results revealed that the performance of AOMDV is more optimal as compared to AODV in terms of throughput, packet delivery fraction and end to end delay. However, in terms of consumption of energy and NRL the AODV protocol performed better as compared to AOMDV.

References Powered by Scopus

Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing

7358Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Random waypoint considered harmful

900Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks

895Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mokbal, F. M. M., Saeed, K., & Dan, W. (2018). Energy consumption evaluation of AODV and AOMDV routing protocols in mobile Ad-Hoc networks. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(8), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2018.090835

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘2301234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

80%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 3

75%

Engineering 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0