Supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi: Our experience

7Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To compare operative times, safety, and effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine versus the prone position. Materials and methods: An observational study of 100 patients was conducted in our institution for 2years from 2018 to 2020 divided into 2 groups: 50 patients underwent modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and 50 patients underwent standard prone PCNL. The inclusion criteria included a renal calculus (calyx or pelvis) of any size for which PCNL was indicated and exclusion criteria were patients having contraindications for PCNL such as bleeding disorders, pregnancy, high risk, and co-morbid conditions. The measured data included operative time, number of punctures, stone-free rate, length of hospital stays, and rate of complications. Results: The 2 groups were comparable in mean age, male to female ratio, calculus size, number of punctures, residual calculi, and postoperative fever and pain. The mean difference of hemoglobin in the supine PCNL group was 0.37 g/dL whereas in the prone PCNL group it was 0.61 g/dL. The p value was significant at 0.043. The mean time to finish from initial postion was 72.24 minutes in supine PCNL and 88.12 minutes in prone PCNL. The p value was significant (p<0.001). The mean time before puncture was 20.92 minutes in the supine position and 31.84 minutes in the prone position. The p value was significant (p<0.001). The mean time from puncture to finish was 51.32 minutes in the supine position and 56.28 minutes in the prone position. The p value was significant (p< 0.001). Conclusions: As observed from this study, supine PCNL is associated with a significantly reduced operating time when compared to conventional prone position PCNL procedures. The postoperative complications such as pain and fever were not significantly different. Hence, the supine PCNL is an equally effective modality for treatment of a renal calculus with benefits of simultaneous retrograde access and less operative time compared to the prone PCNL.

References Powered by Scopus

Percutaneous pyelolithotomy

1092Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Percutaneous stone manipulation

314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Urolithiasis through the ages: Data on more than 200,000 urinary stone analyses

221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Which Position for Novice Surgeons? Effect of Supine and Prone Positions on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Learning Curve

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modified supine (Giusti) percutaneous nephrolithotomy is noninferior to standard prone procedure for renal calculi: A single-center prospective randomized study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outcomes of Complete Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Comparison of Elderly and Young Patients

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mulay, A., Mane, D., Mhaske, S., Shah, A. S., Krishnappa, D., & Sabale, V. (2022). Supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi: Our experience. Current Urology, 16(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000076

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

88%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

78%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

11%

Arts and Humanities 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free