Seeking mandela: Peacemaking between Israelis and Palestinians

44Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The ongoing violence, despair and paralysis among Israelis and Palestinians resemble the gloomy period in South Africa during the late 1980s. Heribert Adam and Kogila Moodley show that these analogies with South Africa can be applied to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for two purposes: to showcase South Africa as an inspiring model for a negotiated settlement and to label Israel a "colonial settler state" that should be confronted with strategies (sanctions, boycotts) similar to those applied against the apartheid regime. Because of the different historical and socio-political contexts, both assumptions are problematic. Whereas peacemaking resulted in an inclusive democracy in South Africa, the favored solution for Israel and the West Bank is territorial separation into two states. Adam and Moodley speculate on what would have happened in the Middle East had there been what they call "a Palestinian Mandela" providing unifying moral and strategic leadership in the ethnic conflict. A timely, relevant look at the issues of a polarized struggle, Seeking Mandela is an original comparison of South Africa and Israel, as well as an important critique on the nature of comparative politics. © 2005 by Temple University Press. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adam, H., & Moodley, K. (2005). Seeking mandela: Peacemaking between Israelis and Palestinians. Seeking Mandela: Peacemaking Between Israelis And Palestinians (pp. 1–224). Temple University Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2006.36.1.88

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free