The role of recall time in producing hypermnesia

127Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In two experiments subjects presented with either words or pictures showed improved recall over three successive recall tests for both types of materials, partially replicating Erdelyi's finding of hypermnesia. However, these subjects did not recall more unique items than other subjects who received only one test equated in time with the three shorter ones. It is concluded that hypermnesia results from simply allowing subjects additional recall time. In a third experiment subjects were shown to recall additional information even after a long recall period employed during an experimental session. This surprising amount of item recovery during long recall periods is attributed to the use of subjective retrieval cues that are thought to function in a manner analogous to externally manipulated cues. © 1978 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words

1061Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Selective reminding for analysis of memory and learning

547Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression

366Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention

2150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice

1489Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness

462Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

L. Roediger, H., & A. Thorpe, L. (1978). The role of recall time in producing hypermnesia. Memory & Cognition, 6(3), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197459

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

56%

Researcher 6

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 13

68%

Neuroscience 3

16%

Computer Science 2

11%

Philosophy 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free