Using an evolutionary game, we show that patients and physicians can interact with predator-prey relationships. Litigious patients who seek compensation are the 'predators' and physicians are their 'prey'. Physicians can adapt to the risk of being sued by performing defensive medicine. We find that improvements in clinical safety can increase the share of litigious patients and leave unchanged the share of physicians who perform defensive medicine. This paradoxical result is consistent with increasing trends in malpractice claims in spite of safety improvements, observed for example in empirical studies on anesthesiologists. Perfect cooperation with neither defensive nor litigious behaviors can be the Paretooptimal solution when it is not a Nash equilibrium, so maximizing social welfare may require government intervention.
CITATION STYLE
Antoci, A., Maccioni, A. F., & Russu, P. (2016). The ecology of defensive medicine and malpractice litigation. PLoS ONE, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150523
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.