Agreement of noninvasive tear break-up time measurement between tomey RT-7000 auto refractor-keratometer and oculus keratograph 5M

38Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: It is difficult to standardize assessment of dry eye in different clinical settings. Increasingly, tear stability is recognized to be important for the definition and assessment of patients with dry eye. Recently, two commercially available instruments have been made available for objectively measuring noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), as an indicator of tear stability: the Tomey RT-7000 Auto Refractor-Keratometer and Oculus Keratograph (K)5M. We aim to assess the agreement of NIBUT measurements using these modalities. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out in a tertiary referral eye center and involved 126 consecutive dry eye patients. NIBUT assessment was performed on the right eyes of participants with both the RT-7000 and the K5M techniques, with the order of assessment randomized. The Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaires were administered to assess dry eye symptoms in the 2 weeks before assessment. Results: The age of the participants was 56.0±14.3 years (69.84% females). Measurements for both modalities were non-normally distributed (right-skewed). The median RT-7000 and K5M readings were 4.2 (range 0.1–10.0) and 6.4 (0.1–24.9) seconds, respectively. RT-7000 and K5M readings were poorly correlated (ρ=0.061, P=0.495). Intraclass correlation coefficient between the modalities was 0.187 (95% confidence interval -0.097 to 0.406). The Bland–Altman plot showed no systematic differences between the readings with these machines. The agreement between machines was not different in different SPEED categories. Conclusion: While there are theoretical and practical benefits of NIBUT for assessment of tear stability over dye-based methods, the agreement between the two modalities was poor. Hence, studies and trials assessing NIBUT should avoid using these modalities interchangeably for NIBUT assessment. More research is needed to improve consensus on how to determine NIBUT.

References Powered by Scopus

The definition and classification of dry eye disease: Report of the definition and classification subcommittee of the international Dry Eye WorkShop (2007)

2700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An objective approach to dry eye disease severity

451Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The economic burden of dry eye disease in the United States: A decision tree analysis

379Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Imaging the Tear Film: A Comparison Between the Subjective Keeler Tearscope-Plus™ and the Objective Oculus® Keratograph 5M and LipiView® Interferometer

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Objective Imaging Diagnostics for Dry Eye Disease

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advances in dry eye imaging: The present and beyond

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, R., Yeo, S., Aung, H. T., & Tong, L. (2016). Agreement of noninvasive tear break-up time measurement between tomey RT-7000 auto refractor-keratometer and oculus keratograph 5M. Clinical Ophthalmology, 10, 1785–1790. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S110180

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

56%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

16%

Researcher 4

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 19

68%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

18%

Physics and Astronomy 2

7%

Psychology 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free