Deniable RSA Signature: The raise and fall of Ali Baba

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The 40 thieves realize that the fortune in their cave is vanishing. A rumor says that Ali Baba has been granted access (in the form of a certificate) to the cave but they need evidence to get justice from the Caliph. On the other hand, Ali Baba wants to be able to securely access to the cave without leaking any evidence. A similar scenario holds in the biometric passport application: Ali Baba wants to be able to prove his identity securely but do not want to leak any transferable evidence of, say, his date of birth. In this paper we discuss the notion of offline non-transferable authentication protocol (ONTAP). We review a construction based on the GQ protocol which could accommodate authentication based on any standard RSA certificate. We also discuss on the fragility of this deniability property with respect to set up assumptions. Namely, if tamper resistance exist, any ONTAP protocol in the standard model collapses. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vaudenay, S. (2012). Deniable RSA Signature: The raise and fall of Ali Baba. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6805 LNCS, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28368-0_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free